Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Cupp

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 16, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether a workers’ compensation award commuted to a lump sum payment during a marriage is community or separate property.

The facts pertinent to this appeal are undisputed. The parties were married in August 1973, and a final decree of dissolution was entered on March 25,1985. Shortly thereafter, the husband, William Cupp, moved to set aside the decree as to the division of property only. After a trial to the court, the court awarded the wife, Vivian, certain assets including personal and real property she had purchased with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Jurek v. JurekArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Marriage of Bugh v. BughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crocker v. CrockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Gersten v. GerstenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Chauncey v. ChaunceyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  4. Crocker v. CrockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Kim v. PakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API