Jurek v. Jurek
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.
James T. Jurek filed an appeal challenging the disposition of property made by the superior court in its decree of dissolution of the marriage of the parties. The sole question raised on appeal is whether the superi- or court erred in awarding the wife one-half of any recovery which the husband might receive for a personal injury he received two days after he filed for dissolution.
The Court of Appeals, in a memorandum decision, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Jurek v. Jurek, 2 CA-CIV 2935, filed October 30, 1978. We granted the appellant’s petition for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Fredrickson & Watson Construction Co v. BoydNevada Supreme Court · 1940
- Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Koelsch v. KoelschArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Fernandez v. RomoArizona Supreme Court · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.