Legal Opinion

Collins v. Hoag & Rollins, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1932No. 27906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is a rehearing of the case reported in 121 Neb. 716. Reference is made to that opinion for a statement of the facts.

This case arises under the workmen’s compensation law. The vital point herein is the validity of the alleged marriage between the claimant for compensation and the deceased workman. The facts proved were sufficient to constitute a common-law marriage, which the trial court held to be a valid marriage. The alleged marriage occurred in this state in 1929, and its validity depends upon the proper interpretation of section 42-104, Comp. St. 1929, and the constitutionality of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Baughn v. UreNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. University of Michigan v. McGuckinNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Knothe v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. MajorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Haggin v. HagginNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Scott v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bowman v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Christensen v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re Binger's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API