Legal Opinion

Richards v. Harpe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1930No. 20038PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. “The right of cross-examination, thorough and sifting, belongs to every party as to the witnesses called against him.” Civil Code (1910), § 5871. “It is a substantial right, the preservation of which is essential to a proper administration of justice, and extends to all matters within the knowledge of the witness, the disclosure of which is material to the controversy.” News Publishing Co. v. Butler, 95 Ga. 559 (22 S. E. 282). Upon the trial of a suit to recover damages from a physician, arising out of the alleged malpractice of the defendant in failing to exercise the “reasonable degree…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blalock v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Grasham v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Gunthorpe v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Norton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Kuttner v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API