Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bardwell v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2010No. 2009-2192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals insofar as it found that appellants, the city of Cleveland and Chief Michael McGrath of the Cleveland Division of Police, violated their duty under the Public Records Act to organize and maintain public records received from pawnbrokers in a manner that allows them to be made available for inspection and copying. The court of appeals granted a writ of mandamus to compel appellants to disclose a complete list of pawnbrokers in the city and ordered appellants to pay $1,000 in statutory damages.1

*196{¶ 2} The court of appeals held that appellants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Lanham v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Gessner v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zidonis v. Columbus State Community CollegeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Patton v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Freed v. BovaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API