Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 24, 2010No. 1-09-0879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toomin

In this appeal, we revisit the “special circumstances” mandating a trial court to put supplemental questions to prospective jurors regarding racial bias. Defendant, William Johnson, was convicted by a jury of home invasion and armed robbery and sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment for home invasion, enhanced by 15 years for committing the offense while armed with a firearm, together with a consecutive sentence of 15 years for armed robbery. He appeals, contending the trial court: (1) erred in rejecting his supplemental questions during voir dire regarding racial and ethnic bias; and (2) failed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. PiatkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BirgeIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  2. In re Commitment of ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. In re Commitment of ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Braddock v. Silgan Plastics CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. People v. RossettiIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API