Crouch v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Atascosa.
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, Chief Justice.
find the conclusions of fact prepared by the trial judge to be sustained by the testimony, and the objections to these conclusions will be considered in our conclusions of law. The conclusions of fact will be adopted by this court, as follows:
That on the 1st day of January, 1886, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract of sale and purchase of 160 acres of land, as alleged in plaintiff’s original petition. The plaintiff gave the defendant a bond for title, and the defendant gave the plaintiff the promissory note for the purchase money, dated January 1,1886, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Soell v. HaddenTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Bigham v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Ogburn v. WhitlowTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Purdom v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pease v. State Ex Rel. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Edwards v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Hazelrigg v. NaranjoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Waybourn v. SpurlockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- City of Abilene v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.