Legal Opinion
Waybourn v. Spurlock
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 17, 1926No. 2547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
Spurlock sued Waybourn in the district court of Hutchinson county to cancel the assignment of an oil lease which he had made to Waybourn. By agreement the venue was changed to the district court of Potter county.
The substance of the plaintiff’s petition is that he entered into an agreement with W. H. Holmes, Thos. Currie, and the Dixon Creek Oil Company to drill an oil well on the northwest quarter of section 9, block Y, in Hutchinson county; that Holmes and Currie executed and delivered to him a lease on the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section; that the Dixon Creek Oil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirby Lumber Company v. ConnTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. Pfeuffer & IrelandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- San Antonio Public Service Co. v. TracyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walling v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Norm Co. v. City Drug StoresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933