Legal Opinion

LA Draper & Son v. WHEELABRATOR-FRYE

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1984No. 83-133PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue presented is whether the filing of an appeal in the federal courts of the dismissal of plaintiff's pendant unfair competition claim serves under Code 1975, § 6-5-440, to abate plaintiff's subsequent unfair competition claim and related common law claims brought in state court. The trial court ruled that the state court action was abated. We affirm.

Plaintiff first filed suit in federal court, asserting that defendants conspired to destroy plaintiff's business in violation of federal antitrust law and state unfair competition law. The federal court had jurisdiction of the unfair…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berman v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  2. Terrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Fegaro v. South Central BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Johnson v. Brown-Service Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Orman v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. L.A. Draper & Son v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., a Corporation Hessco Industrial Supply, Inc., a Corporation Fred Z. Hester, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Shawnee Terminal Railroad v. J.E. Estes Wood Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. CHIEPALICH v. CoaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Huntsville Golf Development, Inc. v. Brindley Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
  5. Central Reserve Life Insurance v. KieferDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API