Legal Opinion

Fegaro v. South Central Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1971No. 6 Div. 784PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, Justice.

This is an appeal by the respondent, Ervin M. Fegaro, from a final decree in a declaratory judgment proceeding which the complainant, South Central Bell Telephone Company, a corporation, (South Central) filed against the respondents, William E. Baker and Comet T.V. Inc., a Kentucky corporation, in which Baker is

principally interested, and, against the corespondents, Ervin M. Fegaro and Comet T.V. Rentals, Inc., an Alabama corporation, in which Fegaro is the principal executive officer. Hereafter, we will call each of them “respondent.” None of the respondents other than Fegaro…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Foster v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Milbra v. Sloss-S. S. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. White v. ManassaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Terrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Thompson v. Medical Licensing BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Jett v. ZinkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Galbreath v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API