Johnson v. Brown-Service Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
Alabama law provides that no one is entitled to prosecute two actions in the courts of the state at the same time, for the same cause and against the same party. Title 7, § 146, Code of Alabama, 1940 (Recomplied, 1958).
The issue presented by this petition is whether suitors who had filed a prior suit in state court and a subsequent one in federal court could be required to elect which one they would prosecute. The trial judge required the plaintiffs to make an election and decide which suit they would prosecute. Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred. We agree.
The facts are as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Foster v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Sessions v. Jack Cole CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bruce v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Mary B. Ermentrout v. Commonwealth Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Terrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ex Parte State Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Moody v. State Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Shepherd v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.