Legal Opinion

McClelland v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 14, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (Bond, L).

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

There are; one hundred and one bills of exceptions in this record, hut they are mainly concerned with only two general questions of evidence. The appellant was indicted for the larceny of a diamond brooch. Upon his trial in the court below he wasi found guilty by the verdict of a jury and was sentenced to imprisonment for three years in the Maryland Penitentiary.' Before the exceptions reserved a,t the trial are considered, the effect of the evidence to which no objection was made will be stated. The accused did not testify, and no evidence on his behalf was offered.

The brooch in question was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Meno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Avery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Freud v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacEwen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. LuccittiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API