Legal Opinion

Luery v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1911PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Two appeals in one i*ecord from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (Dobles, J.). The canses were argued together before Boyd, O. J., Pearce, Burke, Uryer and Stockbeidci?, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

Solomon Luery, Leah Luery and two other parties were indicted separately for receiving stolen goods, Imowing them to have been stolen. The cases were tried before the Court without a jury — having been by agreement heard together. The property alleged to have been stolen was solder which belonged to the United Railways and Electric Company of Baltimore, and Samuel J. Barrett, an employee of that company plead guilty to the larceny of it. The Court rendered verdicts of guilty against the two Luerys, and found the other two not guilty. The two appeals taken by the Luerys were heard together,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. Lanasa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Slansky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Wentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API