Legal Opinion

Hampshire Arms Hotel Co. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1941No. Nos. 32,730, 32,777PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

On September 27, 1940, plaintiff recovered a verdict of guilty against defendant in an unlawful detainer proceeding entitling it to enter a judgment thereon for the restitution of the premises involved. On September 28, 1940, defendant served notice of appeal from the judgment although judgment had not then been entered.

Judgment ivas entered at defendant’s request on October 17. The time to appeal therefrom expired on October 27. On October 29, plaintiff served notice to dismiss the appeal as prematurely taken. On November 4, 1940, the judge who tried the case made and filed an esc parte…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Shields v. Amicable Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Merchants & Manufacturers State Bank v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. In Re MorkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  3. Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API