Connelly v. Derwinski
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to determine, once again, whether a state anti-deficiency scheme is preempted by Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) regulations that authorize the VA to collect deficiencies on VA-guaranteed home loans. This case involves Oregon law, which forbids a deficiency judgment after either a judicial or a non-judicial foreclosure sale. See Or.Rev.Stat. § 86.-770(2). In United States v. Rossi, 342 F.2d 505 (9th Cir.1965), we held that a California anti-deficiency law, which in all material respects is identical to Oregon law, is preempted by the VA…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Arthur Earl McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Alfred Peter RossiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Jones v. TurnageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Connelly v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kaplan v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Carter v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ronald Shepherd, on Behalf of and All in the State of Arizona Similarly Situated Rollin Barkley, on Behalf of and All in the State of Arizona Similarly Situated Robert A. Bricker Marion Rodgers v. Edward J. Derwinski, Administrator of the Veterans' Administration, United States of America v. Rollin Barkley Ronald Shepherd Robert A. Bricker Marion RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992