Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided April 23, 1996No. 94-611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IVERS, Judge:

The pro se appellant, veteran Daniel L. Kaplan, appeals a June 15, 1994, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) requiring the partial repayment of a loan indebtedness in the amount of $4,145.26 plus accrued interest. Daniel L. Kaplan, BVA 94-09229 (June 15, 1994). The Court has jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will affirm the Board’s decision to require partial repayment of the loan indebtedness.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The appellant served on active duty in the United States Army from November…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Smith v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. United States v. Alfred Peter RossiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Schaper v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
  2. Jordan v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  3. McCullough v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  4. Bruce v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API