Legal Opinion

Bilodeau v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1926No. 4801PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an indictment which charged that they, together with Max Hoffman and Walter Young, conspired to secure possession of denatured alcohol free of internal revenue tax, with the intent and for the purpose of willfully, unlawfully, etc., recovering and attempting to recover by redistillation the alcohol so secured by them, and knowingly to conceal and dispose of the same, in violation of section 2 of the Act of Congress of June 7,1906 (Comp. St. § 6118), and the indictment alleged that the defendants were not manufacturers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cavness v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Baugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  5. Bowles v. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API