Legal Opinion
Cavness v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1951No. 12514PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
By unanimous jury verdict appellant was adjudged'guilty of purchasing cocaine and heroin not “in the original stamped package or from the original stamped package”. 53 Stat. 271, (1939), as amended, 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a). He brings this appeal, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 91, 1291, designating as error four rulings of the district court.
The first claim is that eight capsules of cocaine were erroneously admitted in evidence since taken from appellant by means of unlawful search and seizure. It is settled that evidence obtained by federal officers as a result of unlawful search and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Oscar H. KleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John F. Hendrix, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- John Mikus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Charles E. Blackford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.