Legal Opinion

Samuel E. Muniz v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1970No. 28617PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*698GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

We deal here with a constitutional right of no meager or paltry dimension. Basic to our decision in this case is the hallowed concept that the right to a grand jury chosen without discrimination is not a mere constitutional frill or furbelow.

This appeal is prosecuted by Samuel E. Muniz from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Muniz is a United States citizen of Mexican extraction who is presently incarcerated in a Texas prison pursuant to a conviction in a Texas state court. A…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bryan v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Hodgson v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Catherine Foster, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. James L. Sparks, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Graves v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
  5. Jurinko v. Edwin L. Wiegand Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API