Legal Opinion

Jurinko v. Edwin L. Wiegand Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 17, 1973No. Nos. 72-1043, 72-1044PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs-appellees cross-appellants, Mrs. Josephine Jurinko and Mrs. Ida M. Seibert, alleged in Count II of their complaint1 filed against Edwin L. Wiegand Company (Wiegand) that Wiegand refused to employ them in its factory because they were married women, thereby discriminating against them on the basis of sex in violation of Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S. C. § 2000e-2(a)(1)2 Jurisdiction is based on 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3) and 1331(a).

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found probable cause…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Mary Burke Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API