Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Facciolo

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 1, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice :

Plaintiff sustained personal injuries when the motor vehicle he was driving was struck in the rear by a vehicle owned by Sears, Roebuck and Co. and operated by its employee, Albert Degen (defendants). The Court below directed a verdict for plaintiff on the issue of liability and a jury awarded damages totaling $25,313.95. Defendants appeal both aspects of the case.

I

As to liability, we agree with the Superior Court that only one conclusion was legally and factually possible under the evidence: plaintiff’s injuries were proximately caused by Degen’s negligence. Specifically,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilmington Housing Authority v. Williamson Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Baxter v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  4. Eaton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croley v. Republican National CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Hyett's Corner, LLC v. Pearce & Moretto, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API