Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Facciolo
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice :
Plaintiff sustained personal injuries when the motor vehicle he was driving was struck in the rear by a vehicle owned by Sears, Roebuck and Co. and operated by its employee, Albert Degen (defendants). The Court below directed a verdict for plaintiff on the issue of liability and a jury awarded damages totaling $25,313.95. Defendants appeal both aspects of the case.
I
As to liability, we agree with the Superior Court that only one conclusion was legally and factually possible under the evidence: plaintiff’s injuries were proximately caused by Degen’s negligence. Specifically,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Williamson Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Baxter v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Eaton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Croley v. Republican National CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Hyett's Corner, LLC v. Pearce & Moretto, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023