Legal Opinion

Warner v. Mutual Building & Investment Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1934No. 24500PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

As this proceeding involves the constitutionality and construction of Sections 687 and 687-2, General Code (115 Ohio Laws, 3), they are set out at length:

Section 687: “If upon examination, the superintendent of building and loan associations finds that the affairs of a domestic building and loan association are in an unsound or unsafe condition, or that it is conducting its business in whole or in substantial part contrary to law, or failing to comply therewith, or that its affairs are not being conducted for the best interests of its depositors, shareholders or creditors, he may, with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Granite State Provident Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Strauss v. Carolina Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Sjoberg v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Central Elevator Co. v. People ex rel. MoloneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hummer v. ParsonsOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Logan County Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Laub v. WillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Slocum v. Mutual Building & Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Powers v. Capital Endowment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Merion v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API