Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Powers v. Capital Endowment Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1935No. 24416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Is the respondent engaged in the business of a bond investment company within the purview of Sections 697 to 709, General Code? The first of these sections consists of the following definition :

“Every corporation, partnership or association other than a building and loan association, which places or sells certificates, bonds, debentures or other investment securities of any kind, on the partial payment or installment plan, and every investment guaranty company doing business on the service dividend plan shall be deemed a bond investment company.”

It is conceded that the purpose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Warner v. Mutual Building & Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capital Endowment Co. v. KroegerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Slocum v. Mutual Building & Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re National Magazine Publishing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994
  4. Weinreich v. Franklin Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API