Legal Opinion

Hummer v. Parsons

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1924No. 18494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It appearing that there was evidence in the record to support the conclusion of the Court of Appeals, there is but one question presented for the determination of this court, and that is whether this proceeding was a chancery case, appealable to the Court of Appeals. There could have been no prejudice in permitting a new party in the Court of Appeals, who, in effect, waived any claim to the automobile in controversy.

As shown by the foregoing statement, each of the parties, except the owner of the premises, setup a lien which he claimed upon the property in question, and prayed for foreclosure…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. LessovitzOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ireland v. CheneyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Borton v. EarhartOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Warner v. Mutual Building & Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. J. P. Loomis Coal & Supply Co. v. GarchevOhio Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API