Davis v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action ok Contract. Answer containing a general denial and setting np facts on which, defendants claimed a judgment in offset for a balance their dne. Trial by jury at the June Term, 1920, Windsor County, Moulton, J., presiding. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence the Court directed a verdict for the defendants. Judgment on the verdict. The plaintiffs excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
This is an action on a written contract by the terms of which the defendants sold certain standing timber to the plaintiffs and agreed to cut and deliver the same. The defendants filed an answer containing a general denial and setting up facts on which they claimed a judgment in offset for a balance their due. Issue was joined to a jury, and at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence the court ordered a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiffs excepted.
[1-3] Subject to the plaintiffs’ exception, W. S. Reynolds, one of the defendants, was allowed to testify that C. P. Truell directed them to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Usher v. SeveranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Campbell v. PattersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
- Prior v. WilburSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StorrsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- State v. WintersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State v. WoolleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.