Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
*650Addendum, to Note Denying Rehearing.*
Since the rehearing was denied on March 1, 1928, learned counsel for defendant in error have filed with the clerk an additional application. Upon denying the rehearing, the judgment of the court became final, and it has no jurisdiction either by statute or under the rules of court to set aside or correct that judgment in any matter of substance. However the court will enlarge its reasons for denying the rehearing, to be taken as an addition to the brief note handed down on March 1, 1928, 149 Va. 558, (141 S. E. 753.)
The result of the ease is naturally of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Norfolk-Southern Railway Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Hines v. BeardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Stephen Putney Shoe Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Norfolk Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. KrausseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Cleveland v. Danville Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- City of Richmond v. Hood Rubber Products Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Anderson v. SissonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.