Legal Opinion

National Hame & Chain Co. v. Robertson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1928No. 12,837PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Appellee, as the alleged owner and seller of a carload of soft steel bands, brought this action in the Floyd Circuit Court to recover the price thereof. The complaint is in four paragraphs. The first paragraph is for goods and merchandise alleged to have been sold to appellant. The second paragraph alleges that •appellant agreed to purchase the steel “at the price prevailing at the mill” where manufactured, and sets out certain correspondence which it is claimed constituted the contract; that the steel was shipped to appellant and accepted by it. The third paragraph is similar to the second.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cohoon v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kenefick v. SchumakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Walker v. BementIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Timothy Herremans v. Carrera Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. McDaniels v. McDanielsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. V. H. Juerling & Sons, Inc. v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Amerisure Insurance v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Ludlow v. FreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API