Atlantic Richfield Co. v. U.S. Department of Energy
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Judge:
This appeal arose from the denial by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of ARCO’s application to refile Refiner’s Monthly Cost Allocation Reports (RMCARs). The district court affirmed OHA’s denial. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court.
FACTS
During the period of petroleum price controls, the applicable regulations permitted oil refiners to incorporate increased crude oil costs into the prices of their refined products covered by the regulations. The formula for allocating costs to price increases for the covered goods was referred to as the V…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fleming Landfill, Inc. v. GarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, in No. 93-5208 v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in No. 93-5233. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Laborers' International Union v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994