Allstate Lien & Recovery Corp. v. Stansbury
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
In the present case, Cedric Stansbury, Respondent, was informed by Allstate Lien, Jeremy Martin, and Russel Collision, Petitioners, that he would have to pay $1,000 representing “lien enforcement costs” or “cost of process” fees1 in order *190to redeem his Mazda RX-8 prior to its sale.2 It is undisputed that the $1,000 was not actually incurred by Russel Collision but, rather, was the amount agreed upon between Russel Collision and Allstate Lien to conduct the sale. Mr. Stansbury unquestionably received notice of the sale; it is not the efficacy of the sale that is before us. Rather, it is the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Berry & Gould v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Questar Builders, Inc. v. CB Flooring, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Allstate Lien & Recovery Corp. v. StansburyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- The Winton Co. v. MeisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Andrews & Lawrence v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Mills v. Galyn Manor Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- State v. SamplesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Ben-Davies v. Blibaum & Associates, P.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.