Forchheimer v. Franc, Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from interlocutory orders of the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio involves validity and infringement of the Langsdorf patent for neckties, No. 1,447,-090, issued upon an application filed April 12, 1922. There are five claims in the patent, the first four of which wore held valid and infringed and the fifth hold invalid. They are set out in the margin.1
Langsdorf’s tie consists of a body or outside portion of silk cut on the bias, a woven fabric resilient lining cut on the bias, and loose stitching connecting the body portion with the lining.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Van Heusen Products, Inc. v. Earl & WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
3Cited by20 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc. v. Arthur Siegman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Kemper-Thomas Co. v. J. P. Gordon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Lowell v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc. v. Arthur Siegman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.