Legal Opinion
Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc. v. Arthur Siegman, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THACHER, District Judge.
This patent has already been litigated in the Sixth circuit, wherein the District Court Judge Westenhaver held claims 1, 2, 3, and 4, here in suit, valid and infringed. In the Circuit Court of Appeals, Judges Moorman and Donahue held the patent invalid for lack of invention; Judge Denison dissenting. Forchheimer v. Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, 20 F.(2d) 553.
The invention relates to improvements in neckties, and more particularly to those of the four-in-hand type. After referring to difficulties encountered in constructing a tie which will withstand the strains of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc. v. Arthur Siegman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Matrix Contrast Corp. v. KellarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Hewes & Potter, Inc. v. MeyersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Troy v. Hakin Bros.-Kassar Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.