Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hermina

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 13, 2004No. Misc. AG No. 88, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

Acting through Bar Counsel, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, John Hermina, charging him with violating several of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-752(a), we referred the petition to Judge Maureen Lamasney, of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law.

After a three-day hearing, Judge Lamasney filed a Statement of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in which she concluded that Hermina…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. Baltimore Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Seth Eugene BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API