Brush v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
The question brought here for determination is whether the salary of petitioner as Chief Engineer of the Bureau of Water Supply of the City of New York is a part of his taxable income for the purposes of the federal income-*360tax law. The answer depends upon whether the water system of the city was created and is conducted in the exercise of the city’s governmental functions. If so, its operations are immune from federal taxation and, as a necessary corollary, “fixed salaries and compensation paid to its officers and employees in their capacity as such are likewise immune.” New York ex rel.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mayo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.