Legal Opinion

Friends of Animals Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 22, 1997No. 810, Docket 97-6067PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants Friends of Animals Incorporated (“FOA”) and Priscilla Feral, the president of FOA, appeal from that por*333tion of a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Warren W. Eginton, Judge) dismissing their complaint with prejudice.

I

FOA and Feral brought this action in state court in Connecticut alleging, principally, defamation claims under Connecticut state law and wiretapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants-appellees had defamed them by making statements linking FOA and Feral with Frances…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Fishoff v. Coty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Ofoedu v. St. Francis HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API