Legal Opinion
Ofoedu v. St. Francis Hospital
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 16, 2006No. 3:04CV1707 (PCD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL & FOR AN AWARD OF SANCTIONS & PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
DORSEY, District Judge.
Defendants move [Doc. No. 45], pursuant to Rules 30 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 7 and 37, for an order compelling Plaintiff to produce all documents requested in Defendants’ First Set of Requests for Production and for an award of sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel (Attorney Emengo) for their “willful and repeated failure to comply with the rules of discovery.” Defs Mot. Compel at 1. In response, Plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- John B. Hull, Inc. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Friends of Animals Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Jones v. J.C. Penney's Department Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galanski v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Mills v. Wal-Mart Associates,Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.