Legal Opinion

Reeser Motor Co. v. Reichelderfer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1933No. 22717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER - CURIAM.

From a judgment of the court of comlmon pleas in and for Tulsa county and th© order overruling th© motion Eor new trial, the plaintiff appeals. Defendants- in error have filed motion to dismiss the appeal: First, because the case-made was not served within the time allowed by law or by any valid order -of extension; second, because the purported motion for new trial was not subscribed, either by th© plaintiff in error or by its attorneys; third, that there does not appear in the case-made any order overruling the purported motion for new trial; fourth, that casemiade cannot be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Smith v. FashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Curtis v. Mason HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Forrest E. Gilmore Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Cunningham v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Price v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API