Reeser Motor Co. v. Reichelderfer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER - CURIAM.
From a judgment of the court of comlmon pleas in and for Tulsa county and th© order overruling th© motion Eor new trial, the plaintiff appeals. Defendants- in error have filed motion to dismiss the appeal: First, because the case-made was not served within the time allowed by law or by any valid order -of extension; second, because the purported motion for new trial was not subscribed, either by th© plaintiff in error or by its attorneys; third, that there does not appear in the case-made any order overruling the purported motion for new trial; fourth, that casemiade cannot be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Smith v. FashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Curtis v. Mason HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Forrest E. Gilmore Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Cunningham v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936