Legal Opinion
Kane v. Union State Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 20, 1964No. 3930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
Union State Bank sued Bell Construction Company, its partners and David Kane on promissory notes executed by them to the bank. Kane answered that the bank represented it had a “valid” assignment of Bell’s contract with San Antonio but that said assignment was invalid. He alleged the bank was negligent in accepting an invalid assignment and representing to Kane that it was valid; that said representation was material and he relied thereon; that if the bank had not been negligent in accepting an invalid assignment payment would have been made to the bank by San Antonio…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Johnson v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Bonner Oil Co. v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Dean v. Allied Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisher v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Martin v. Coastal States Gas Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Roseborough v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- First National Bank in Dallas v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hood v. First National Bank of PanhandleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.