Hood v. First National Bank of Panhandle
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DENTON, Chief Justice.
This is a suit for the balance due on a promissory note, interest and attorneys’ fees brought by appellee, First National Bank of Panhandle against appellant B. G. Hood and A. J. Atkins. The trial was before the court without a jury. The court entered judgment for the bank against both defendants jointly and severally for the un-contradicted balance due, interest and stipulated attorneys’ fees. Only Hood has appealed.
Atkins and Hood entered into an agreement for Atkins to purchase a service station from Hood, but in order to complete the purchase it was necessary for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bavousett v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Rattan v. DickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Keeton v. Gillam Soap WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Henslee v. First National Bank of WhitewrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Kane v. Union State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hendershot v. Amarillo National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- First National Bank in Dallas v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Gilbert v. SmedleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Landin v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Aircraftsmen, Inc. v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968