Legal Opinion

Hood v. First National Bank of Panhandle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1966No. 7652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENTON, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for the balance due on a promissory note, interest and attorneys’ fees brought by appellee, First National Bank of Panhandle against appellant B. G. Hood and A. J. Atkins. The trial was before the court without a jury. The court entered judgment for the bank against both defendants jointly and severally for the un-contradicted balance due, interest and stipulated attorneys’ fees. Only Hood has appealed.

Atkins and Hood entered into an agreement for Atkins to purchase a service station from Hood, but in order to complete the purchase it was necessary for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bavousett v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Rattan v. DickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Keeton v. Gillam Soap WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Henslee v. First National Bank of WhitewrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Kane v. Union State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hendershot v. Amarillo National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. First National Bank in Dallas v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Gilbert v. SmedleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Landin v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Aircraftsmen, Inc. v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API