Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.
This appeal requires us to address whether a plaintiff who seeks damages for contracting mesothelioma based on exposure to a defendant’s asbestos-containing products must satisfy the standards expressed in Parker v Mobil Oil Corp. (7 NY3d 434 [2006]) and Cornell v 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC (22 NY3d 762 [2014]) by offering evidence that, if it does not provide an exact mathematical quantification of that exposure, at least provides some “scientific expression” (Parker at 449) of the level of exposure to toxins in defendant’s products that was sufficient to have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wright v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cornell v. 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. A.O Smith Water Prods. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bagley v. Adel Wiggins GroupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Schwartz v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- O'Connor v. Aerco International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.