Legal Opinion
Cornell v. 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLC
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 2014PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiff Brenda Cornell (Cornell) did not raise a triable issue of fact to rebut the prima facie showing made by defendant 360 West 51st Street Corp. (51st Street Corporation or the corporation) that her claimed personal injuries were not caused by indoor exposure to dampness and mold. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted the corporation’s cross motion for summary judgment to dismiss Cornell’s complaint in its entirety.
I
The Complaint
With the exception of a nearly two-year gap, Cornell resided in a first-floor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- MOTOROLA INC. v. MICHAEL PATRICK MURRAYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Sean R. v. BMW of North America, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. A.O Smith Water Prods. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.