Bradford v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action was brought May 14, 1895, to enjoin the defendants, as supervisors and as auditor and treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco, from incurring any indebtedness or expenses against said city and county during the months of May and June, 1895, whereby there shall be a deficiency in the income and revenue of said city and county provided for the fiscal year of 1894-95, and from ordering any sup*539plies or materials for said city and comity for its maintenance, or any department thereof, whereby there si 1 all be created an indebtedness in excess of the revenue and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sackett v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Robertson v. BreedloveTexas Supreme Court · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Clouse v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- County of Tehama v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.