Legal Opinion

American Alternative Ins. Co., Inc. v. York

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2004No. Docket 121968PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the Michigan no-fault automobile insurance act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., intentional conduct resulting in harm strips an insured tortfeasor of the immunity from liability otherwise given by the act. Here, the insured’s conduct was found to be wilful and wanton. The Court of Appeals held that such conduct was not the equivalent of intentional misconduct and, so, the insured retained the immunity from liability granted by the act. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, but for different reasons.

i

While attending a Christmas party in 1997, defendant Donald York drank for six or seven…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hicks v. VaughtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wold Architects and Engineers v. StratMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. DIALLO v. LaROCHELLEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Wessels v. Garden Way, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Gray v. ChrostowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Renny v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API