Legal Opinion

Renny v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2006No. Docket 257018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case arising from a slip and fall incident, plaintiffs Karen Renny and Charles Renny appeal as of right the Court of Claims order granting defendant Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (C)(8). On appeal, the Rennys argue that the trial court erred in finding that they failed to state a claim within the “public building” exception to governmental immunity. We reverse and remand.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 8, 2000, the Rennys stopped at a roadside rest area located in Roscommon County, Michigan. There is no…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLean v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Renny v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Roby v. City of Mount ClemensMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Renny v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API