United States v. Charles Schwarz, Thomas Wiese, and Thomas Bruder, Justin A. Volpe and Michael Bellomo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We write for the limited purpose of addressing appellants’ claim that the Government violated its obligation to disclose exculpatory material under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972).
I
We assume familiarity with the facts of this case, which are presented in detail in an opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Eugene H. Nickerson, Judge). See United States v. Bruder, 103 F.Supp.2d 155 (E.D.N.Y.2000). We summarize below only the facts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Charles Schwarz, Thomas Wiese, and Thomas Bruder, Justin A. Volpe and Michael BellomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Faiz Shabazz v. Christopher Artuz, Supt. Green Haven Cor. Fac.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- United States v. LujanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008