Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.
Bringing into question the correctness of the Columbia County Chancery Court’s findings and decree sustaining a demurrer interposed by appellees to appellants’ complaint, this appeal is prosecuted. In effect, the complaint alleged: That appellants are citizens, taxpayers and property owners within the boundaries of Waterworks Improvement District 1, situated within the corporate limits of Magnolia, Arkansas; that in the year 1923 appellee Waterworks Improvement Dist. 1 of Magnolia was duly organized and established, and that J. O. Hutchinson, H. P. Carrington and D. D. Good are now and have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tallman v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Frick v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Smith v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Spearman v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. NewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Biedenharn v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CristDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
- Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.