Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1934No. 4-3502PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

Bringing into question the correctness of the Columbia County Chancery Court’s findings and decree sustaining a demurrer interposed by appellees to appellants’ complaint, this appeal is prosecuted. In effect, the complaint alleged: That appellants are citizens, taxpayers and property owners within the boundaries of Waterworks Improvement District 1, situated within the corporate limits of Magnolia, Arkansas; that in the year 1923 appellee Waterworks Improvement Dist. 1 of Magnolia was duly organized and established, and that J. O. Hutchinson, H. P. Carrington and D. D. Good are now and have…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tallman v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Frick v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Smith v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Spearman v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. NewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Biedenharn v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CristDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
  5. Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API