Legal Opinion

United States v. Brooks

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 17, 1995No. Army Misc 9401905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Senior Judge:

This ease involves a government appeal filed with this court pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The government appeals the decision of a military judge in a general court-martial to set aside the court members’ announced finding of guilty, and his entry of a finding of not guilty instead. We must decide initially whether this court has jurisdiction to hear the government’s appeal, and, if so, we must decide whether the military judge erred. We hold that we have jurisdiction to hear…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. Specialist BENJAMIN C. HILLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
  3. United States v. KnightArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API