Legal Opinion

United States v. Knight

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 28, 1995No. ARMY 9302252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MOGRIDGE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of rape in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for seven years, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for twenty-four months and reduction to Private El.

Although the appellant asserts several issues, the controlling issue on appeal is whether the numerous and intentional…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. ReskoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. McNuttArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API