Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Ind. Comm. of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1927No. 4552PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

Joseph Surrage, alleging that he was an employee of the Southern Pacific Company (operating a railroad), and sustained injuries in the course of his employment, applied to the Industrial Commission for an award of compensation to be paid him by the company in pursuance of our Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165). The company resisted the application on the grounds (1) that the applicant was not in its employ, but was an independent contractor, and (2) though it be held that the applicant was its employee, his injury resulted while he was employed- in interstate commerce…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Milburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Steward v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Harrington v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Harris v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Harrington v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API