Legal Opinion

Hom v. Petrou

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 2021No. A161770Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/3/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR STEPHEN HOM, as Trustee, etc., Cross-complainant and Appellant, A161770 v. (City & County of San Francisco DENNIS PETROU et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-13-536307) Cross-defendants and Respondents. Stephen Hom appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Dennis Petrou and Brian Utter after the settlement and dismissal of a cross-complaint Hom filed against them and others. He argues the trial court erred because Petrou and Utter were not prevailing parties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Goonewardene v. ADP, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API