Legal Opinion

State v. Irwin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 1986No. 13735-2-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ringold, A.C.J.

At a bench trial Jack E. Irwin, Sr. and Jack E. Irwin, Jr. were found guilty of several violations of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50, and one count each of conspiracy. They appeal arguing: (1) that conversations taped in violation of the Privacy Act, RCW 9.73, were improperly admitted; (2) that the affidavits supporting the search warrants of their property were invalid; (3) that they received ineffective assistance of counsel; (4) that a contingent fee arrangement between Vince Kochajda, an informer, and the police violated the Irwins' due process rights; (5)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. George Lawson and Ronald ScharfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. O'NEILLWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States v. KohneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Irwin v. MountCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. State v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API